Formerly Known as Captain Speaking @Proyect7010

@7venlucadi Como los veracruzanos elijen tan bien a sus gobernantes, seguro atendería tu recomendación

Esto es de gente barata o hambreada, porque no pegas la pagina completa?

Luis Chaparro @LuisKuryaki

10 hours ago

¿No que no? @AlfonsoDurazo

100 1K 3K 135K 102

@cristian2222 @amazonmex @Profeco Si pagaste con AMEX, la tienes ganada

@palomateranv Todo lo que tenia que hacer era enseñar la visa, es la cosa mas sencilla. Imagina el efecto devastador para la credibilidad de los periodistas y el nado sincronizado de “la derecha”, pero como no enseñó nada, pues tu eres una mentirosa, y tu gober, testigo cooperante.

Si nadie en el book compra, como es que sube?

Toda la sesión con CVD negativo, pinche disonancia cognitiva no me deja en paz

The chances of a deer taking you out at a crosswalk are slim. But never zero.

Nassim Taleb on a bet most people would take: 70% chance to win $1, 30% chance to lose $1 - should you bet? His answer: in most cases no. Not because of risk aversion. Because it's a bad strategy in multi-period reality Same Kelly Criterion math that powers Shannon's information theory - there's a sweet spot, and most behavioral finance papers ignore it Bet too much and the law of large numbers ruins you. Bet too little and you leave returns on the table this is what every quant learns before they touch capital

Alex @de1lymoon

a week ago

x.com/i/article/2057…

30 90 642 1.2M 3K

@RaminNasibov Doom

Este seguro es joto igual que el primo, por lo lioso los conocereis

Rodrigo P. Mendez @Wontoya13

4 days ago

Yo soy el primo de @oscarbalmen y mi hermano Carlos, es una persona con discapacidad, tiene Síndrome de Down @ChumelTorres eres un pedazo de mierda que no le llega a los talones a mi hermano, escupo en tus huesos y en los de tus ancestros

131 41 239 69K 15

An English engineer wrote a calculus book in 1910 opening with the line "what one fool can do, another can," and proved that almost everything making math feel impossible was put there on purpose by people who wanted it to stay exclusive. His name was Silvanus P. Thompson. He was a physicist, an engineer, a Fellow of the Royal Society, and a professor at the City and Guilds Technical College in London. He had spent his entire career teaching calculus to working-class engineering students who needed the math to actually do their jobs, and he had watched generation after generation of bright kids walk out of math classrooms convinced they were stupid. He knew they were not stupid. He knew exactly what was wrong, and he was about to say it in print in a way that would get him quietly hated by every academic mathematician in Britain. In 1910 he published Calculus Made Easy. He published it anonymously at first, listing the author only as F.R.S., which stood for Fellow of the Royal Society. He did not want his name attached to it until he saw how the establishment was going to respond. Because the prologue of the book was not a polite introduction. It was an accusation. He wrote that calculus was not actually hard. He wrote that the people writing the standard textbooks were what he called "clever fools" who deliberately took the easiest parts of the subject and presented them in the most complicated way possible, because doing so made them look more impressive. He wrote that they "seldom take the trouble to show you how easy the easy calculations are" and instead "seem to desire to impress you with their tremendous cleverness by going about it in the most difficult way." Then he opened the first chapter by telling readers something nobody had been willing to admit out loud. The reason calculus felt impossible was not because calculus was impossible. It was because the symbols had been chosen to feel impossible. The notation looked like ancient ritual on purpose. The Greek letters, the formal epsilon-delta definitions, the abstract limit proofs that opened every standard textbook, were not how Newton and Leibniz had originally thought about the subject. They were a 19th century renovation of the field done by professional mathematicians who wanted calculus to feel like a closed shop. Thompson refused to use any of it. He went back to the way Leibniz had thought about it 250 years earlier. The letter d in front of a variable, he told his readers, just meant "a little bit of." That was the whole secret. dx meant "a little bit of x." dy meant "a little bit of y." dy/dx meant "a little bit of y divided by a little bit of x," which is just how steep the curve is going at that exact moment. Integration was the opposite. It just meant adding up all the little bits. That is calculus. That is the entire subject. Everything else is technique, and the technique only works once you understand what you are doing. A 12-year-old can follow that explanation. A 12-year-old cannot follow the opening chapter of a typical university calculus textbook. The gap between those two facts is the entire reason most adults walk around believing they are bad at math. The book became one of the bestselling math books in history. Over a million copies. Still in print 115 years later. Still recommended by physicists, engineers, and self-taught learners as the only calculus book they actually finished. Martin Gardner revised it in 1998 and the foundation of the book did not need to change because Thompson had built it on Leibniz, not on the academic conventions that have come and gone since. The deeper point Thompson was making is the part that should haunt anyone reading this in 2026. Difficulty is often a marketing strategy. It is not always a property of the subject. When a discipline is taught in a way that feels impossible, the difficulty is doing a job for someone. It is keeping the field small. It is protecting the salaries and the status of the people already inside it. It is filtering out the kinds of people who would otherwise show up and crowd the room. This happens in math. It happens in law. It happens in medicine. It happens in finance, in machine learning, in philosophy, in software. Every field has a layer of jargon and notation and ritual sitting on top of a core idea that is usually much simpler than the people inside the field want to admit. The jargon is not there to communicate. It is there to gatekeep. The way you recognize a real teacher is that they keep stripping the ritual off. The way you recognize someone protecting their priesthood is that they keep piling it on. Thompson finished his prologue with five words that are the entire spirit of his project. "What one fool can do, another can." He meant it as both a joke and a threat. If a working-class engineering student in 1910 with no Greek and no Latin and no university privileges could learn calculus from a 200-page paperback, then so could anyone the establishment had been excluding for the previous 200 years. Most subjects you have given up on were never as hard as the people teaching them needed you to believe. You were not stupid. The course was designed to make you feel that way. What one fool can do, another can.

@LnkFong @Lector_Espiado @rosaicela_ Búscale su paso en CONAGUA y la beca en Francia

Los jotos tambien

JorgeArmandoRocha @JorgeArmandoR_

5 days ago

Las personas con Síndrome de Down son extremadamente sensibles e inteligentes. Algo que Chumel Torres jamás será.

212 549 2K 28K 5

Hoy es el día de los cobardes en mi TL

Gabriel Guerra C @gabrielguerrac

5 days ago

Ayer expresé mi opinión acerca de @ChumelTorres Hoy, dos de sus fans/admiradores fueron a desenterrar un post mío de hace 5 años en qué me refería yo a las hordas mongolas. Por favor alguien explíqueles que “mongol” es el gentilicio para referirse a las personas de Mongolia.

93 108 742 35K 15

Hay faltos de columna vertebral y este batillo.

Marco Levario Turcott @Arouet_V

6 days ago

.@warkentin: Desde hace siete años y medio te advertí que estabas equivocada en confiar en @lopezobrador_ y, poco después, te dije que tus opiniones "equilibradas" reflejaban astucia pero no inteligencia. La diferencia entre una y otra es que te quisiste desmarcar de la

273 1K 4K 106K 191

@MarquesDVassals @sabinaberman Era puta intelectualoide, de pose, eso es de lo mas bajo y deshonesto que hay, tus ideas y convicciones por dinero. Las otras solo venden el cuerpo. Imagina 14 años tragando esa clase de mierda y acallando tu verdadero ser por dinero.

Lo dicho, no hay joto que no sea lioso

Oscar Balmen @oscarbalmen

7 days ago

@JUANRAMIROBARRE @ChumelTorres @Radio_Formula Soy pendejofóbico y estes mi último mensaje para pendejos como tú.

36 11 1K 26K 1

@J_Fdz_Menendez @bibianabelsasso Ese reportaje salió en Reuters hace casi 4 meses

@sinuhedotcom No hay joto que no sea lioso

@IndiraKempis @ITAM_mx Observa el producto terminado del ITAM y dime donde ves ríos de valientes graduados, listos y dispuestos a romper lanzas vs molinos de viento del sistema. Yo los veo mas dispuestos a vivir de el. Eso se enseña ahí